I’ve mentioned ‘conflicts of consciousness’ in the latest three posts with my understanding (read below). However, there was arguing with a different interpreter of Ummite through telepathy. It’s really different from our common idea or, would be an opposite idea on progress and evolution. Let me try to explain it below.
http://thechaosinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com.br/2013/04/no-good-or-evil-in-human-evolution-event.html
No ‘good and evil’ in the evolution event
If an OWI (‘organism with intelligence’) would evolve, we could realize harmony, peace, and stability in our society, eliminating egoism and violence with fraternity and respect, such as human progress and civilizations could result (but it was just outlook). I believe that everyone thinks so including me. However, according to Ummite, the evolution of OWI doesn’t result in such an ideal situation. It seems to go back to barbarous ages.
Every evolution of OWI occurs through ‘conflicts of consciousness’ absolutely, which means it doesn’t occur with harmony, respect, reconciliation, and so on according to bullshit Ummite who provokes a lot of confusion and anger. It might even be fighting.
Perhaps Ummite would try a ‘conflicts of consciousness’ against me. Even though I’m really fucked up and become very angry, I can understand the reason for such persisting ‘attack’ on a person with Asperger syndrome (read below), namely, Ummite. If there had been direct contact with Ummite, my anger might have been uncontrollable. So this problem would be one of the reasons to avoid direct contact with Ummite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome
Asperger syndrome
Then ‘conflicts of consciousness’ begin as controversy and it results in escalated conflict with force and violence and, eventually, it should end with the extinction (death) of one of the adversaries in the fight. It would be a war as the final option. However, murder would be the worst sin and the worst evil for the human.
Without a doubt, I couldn’t promote murder, but our progressive and civilized cultural values define murder as an absolute evil is not correct. According to the Bible, Jesus Christ said, “Thou shall not kill”. However, although a person would be a pious Christian, it’s not important whether catholic rhetoric or not, an absolute obeying of this Jesus’ word might be difficult. Still, there would be a person who obeys it and if his argument would be, for example, because of my unique life and, life will never return or, it’s irreplaceable, it would be misunderstood.
What religions need is chaos. Why do people need religion? Because most people have anxiety about their lives, health problems, and so on, they are afraid of dying without knowing what happens after death. There’s no more reasonable explanation for me. Regions’ swindling fools such people and imprints such argument above. However, our body is just an elusive ‘container’ for the soul or consciousness that the consciousness creates. So even though people die (extinct of the ‘container’), the soul doesn’t disappear (read below).
http://thechaosinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com.br/2012/11/iposted-god-does-not-exist-because-we.html
We are not made of matter
http://thechaosinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com.br/2010/07/how-ummite-discovered-life-after-death.html
How did Ummite discover ‘That world’ and ‘Net work of the soul’?
Incidentally, the death penalty opponents argue that no one condemns it – although cruel homicidal maniacs could repeater homicides – because there’s a false accusation possibility. But it’s mere religious fundamentalism and a switching argument. It means that this problem is not the death penalty – it’s the only technical mistake of justice.
The world is filled with egoists, liars, cunning, provokers, and shameless people, it may be countries or maybe individuals. As a Japanese citizen, these are China and two Koreas – there would be a big war between the countries (read below). When I was angered by Ummite, I compared his comportment with Chinese and Korean egoism and provocations.
http://thechaosinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com.br/2010/11/signs-of-big-war-in-far-east-2.html
Sins of a big war in the Far East -2
However, such egoism and so on would not be absolute evil as well as the murder case above. Their strong egoistic inclination that the Japanese don’t have must be one of the conditions to survive at ‘conflicts of consciousness’. But obviously, it could provoke many more conflicts with other people reducing its opportunity to survive.
Moreover, even though ‘They’ would use information based on lies and if ‘they’ could obtain to imprint (mind control) with such information, it could change to the truth because our world is made of ‘crowded consciousness’. Then, if you were an easy ‘Ascension’ geek, this argument of Ummite might be an amazing hit for you. It should be the wrong way for the ‘Ascension’ geek.
In the latest post, I argued that there’s no ‘good and evil’ in the human evolution event. the above explanation is the reason that the valuation of ‘They’ by ‘good and evil’ is insignificant. In addition, I can say the same thing about ethics and morals. In human history, the human would understand that ethics and morals are good absolutely. This means that the chance to survive with them might be bigger than survival with egoism etc. I value ethics and morals, but nobody knows which one would remain in the evolution process.
I have telepathy ability and article writing skills as Ummites want, but why did Ummites choose me although I may be a person skeptical, cold and short temper, not so generous, avoiding choosing more respectable persons such as Jesus Christ and Buddha who value love, generosity, tolerance, illumination, wisdom and so on? Conclusively, I’ve known this reason with the above explanation.
Well, can you agree above argument of Ummite? Obviously, don’t you? No problem. If you could swim over in ‘conflicts of consciousness’, your intention could change to the truth. Overall OWI who lives in the universe has the same chance. Our world and universe depend on overall ‘crowded consciousness’. The future doesn’t depend on Gog, which doesn’t exist. Literally, nobody knows the future.
Using this opportunity let me reveal my arguments even if I would face your criticism. I believe we should agree that some part of the NWO constipation of ‘They’ controlled by ‘That world’ has rationality, even though I’m against slaving people by ‘They’ and any ruler’s egoism. Population control and so-called eugenics are necessary to avoid social chaos.
Current fraudulent democracy together with the money economy must be discarded and, individual liberty and Human rights should be limited rigorously. Moreover, governments and languages of the world should be uninfected. Religions would be unnecessary if people understood human evolution mining and, it should be banned considering it could be a tool to rule and deceive people. ‘They’ and criminalists know best the inexistence of God because if God existed, they couldn’t practice things that God bans.
About my argument below in the post, ‘What does “untold universe” mean?’, there was the next controvert of Ummite via telepathy – Advanced technologies and arms of Ummite are illusions as well as matter, science & technology, mathematics, and so on of the human. Therefore, Ummite doesn’t have such an advantage in ‘conflicts of consciousness’ against the human. Will the human have the ability to counterattack?
I don’t think evolution could be achieved by the superior someone dominates others with his technology power. I feel obviously an arrogance of Ummite in the position of superiority.
